LAI, CHIEN HUNG
Chung Yuan Christian University, Department of Information and Computer Engineering, Assistant Professor
Email：soulwind@cycu.org.tw
CHANG, YUN TE
Chung Yuan Christian University, Department of Information and Computer Engineering, Student
Email：c7897771@gmail.com
Abstract
A good design of multiple-choice questions can show the learning status of students. On the contrary, if the multiple-choice questions are not designed properly, it will cause students to not think completely and focus on memorizing the correct options, that is, unable to establish a complete concept. This study develops a learning system, and students are divided into two groups. The experimental group see one option at a time, and students need to think whether the option is the correct answer, and if it is not, they will see the next option. The control group uses traditional four-choice multiple-choice questions to learn. This study explores which way of answering has a better impact on students’ learning. The results showed that the two answering methods have obvious help for students’ learning. The experimental group has a significant difference from the control group in the post-test of learning achievement. Further analysis of the students’ opinions shows that the students are used to the traditional answering method. There will be difficulties in the new way of answering, but they still think if you can get used to it, it can have a positive impact on learning.
Keywords :new multiple-choice questions, true-false thinking mode, learning achievement